Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated) Binding: VHS Tape EAN: 9786300200210 Format: Black & White ISBN: 6300200213 Label: Mpi Home Video Manufacturer: Mpi Home Video Number Of Items: 2 Publisher: Mpi Home Video Release Date: 1987-10-21 Running Time: 360 Studio: Mpi Home Video
Customer Rating: Summary: A gold mine! This documentary needs to be preserved! Comment: This documentary is absolutely the best visual document of the Spanish Civil War that I have ever seen! Running six hours in length it tells the story from the events that led up to the war up though the first years of Franco's dictatorship.
What makes this documentary so great?
1) There is extensive footage of events.
2) The story is told largely through interviews with people who lived through it, both important personages and ordinary citizens. Produced in the 1980's we hear firsthand accounts from diverse figures such as members of the Republican government, Pilar Primo de Rivera, the anarchist leader Federica Montseny, La pasionaria, high ranking officers in Franco's army, the chief of police in Barcelona during the war, the German commander of the squadron that bombed Guernica, landless peasants, Andalusian landowners, members of the Catalan independence movement, socialists, Asturian coal miners, right-wing militiamen, a Portuguese reporter who witnessed the massacre of Republicans in the bullring of Badajoz, and international volunteers from several countries.
3) Through these interviews, the documentary gives a multi-faceted perspective on the war and in this way resists the tendency to present a Manichean narrative of events. When Franco was in power, the Nationalists were the heroes and the Republicans, the villains. In post-Franco Spain, the tables have turned: the Nationalists were monsters and the Republicans, the heroes of freedom. This documenrtary, however, reminds us that both sides massacred civilians and carried out unprovoked assassinations. The fog of war turned many people into brutes. Furthermore, although my sympathies are clearly with the Republic, I appreciated hearing the points of view of Franco's supporters, because it helps me understand WHY they would side with Franco. Those with wealth and property feared losing everything they owned, and even feared for their lives (rightfully so, considering that there were random assassinations of landowners). Also, a belief in the righteousness of a traditional world order supported by social hierarchies, patriarchy and religion, brought many people, of all social classes and nationalities, to the Nationalist side. I find this particularly interesting as it echoes what we continue to see happening in politics today: cultural issues trump economic ones when people feel uneasy with modernity (today "postmodernity"). Many people clearly yearn for a structured world of moral absolutes above all else, including over personal economic interests or social justice.
5) It goes into depth about the political divisions that seriously undermined the Republic. The Republic consisted of moderate Republicans, Socialists, Communists (pro- and anti-Stalin, the latter group belong mainly to the POUM), and Anarchists (mainly organized in the trade union the CNT). At the beginning of the war, the Anarchists rose to power in Barcelona since they were the ones to take up arms and initially defeat the loyalist troops. Their dominance, however, severely divided the left. In addition to fighting Franco, they sought a social revolution: a complete restructuring of society in which church, government and private property were abolished and in which the workers took control of all the means of production through the establishment of collectives. The Anarchists' forced collectivization of land and factories, random acts of violence, murder of factory and landowners and attacks on the Church and its members, alienated much of the middle-class, some of whom initially supported the Republic because of their regional loyalties. Later in the war, the Anarchists and the POUM would become the victims of Stalin and his Communist supporters. In their attempts to organize and unify the left, the pro-Stalin Communists were determined to crush the Anarchists and their revolution. In order to do so, they killed (and sometimes even tortured) many of its followers. These divisions weakened the Republican forces while Franco's troops continued to make significant advances on the war front.
6) We get a very thorough explanation of the Anarchist movements in Catalonia and Aragon. The Anarchist movement in Spain was the largest and most successful in Western Europe. They abolished government and the Church. Factories and farms were collectivized and run by the workers, money was eliminated and barter took its place. Production was high and the workers' conditions approved greatly; they were even given healthcare and adequate pensions. The experiment was clearly a success. One is left wondering if Anarchism is actually a viable political system: would it have continued to function if it had been allowed to continue?
One leaves this documentary with a very good sense of the great complexity of the Spanish Civil War, an event in which almost all the political ideologies of Western Europe came into play. Sadly one is also left feeling that the war was probably inevitable. The society of the time was so polarized that there was no center; no government could have possibly appeased all sides.
I know many people argue that Franco's victory was probably the best thing since the pro-Stalin Communists had become the dominant force on the left and Stalin proved himself to be much more brutal than Franco. But, personally I don't buy this argument. First of all, the Republic was forced to depend on Stalin because Britain, France and the US chose to remain "neutral," while Germany and Italy armed Franco to the teeth. Furthermore, even if a Stalin-dominated government had won, this would have made Spain part of the allied forces in WWII (remember Stalin fought with us against Hitler in the war). Considering how the map of post-war Europe was drawn, Spain most likely would have been established as one of the free democracies of Western Europe, and not as a Soviet satellite. I believe non-intervention on the part of Western democracies was a huge mistake. It meant that Spain would have to suffer nearly four decades of a Franco dictatorship before it could establish the democracy it should have created in 1936.
Absolutely wonderful documentary! Highly recommended to anyone interested in the Spanish Civil War! Customer Rating: Summary: Invaluable insight into the reality of the Spanish Civil War Comment: I had already read George Orwell's "Homage to Catalonia" before I saw this video. If you are at all familiar with the Spanish Civil War you can understand why I came away from that excellent book still pretty confused about all of the political parties (left AND right), their leaders, their motives, and the roles they played in the loss of the war to General Franco.
But this video is absolutely fabulous in clearing much of that up. It is true that it is long (six one-hour parts), but that is because it is obviously meant for a class or tv documentary series. One reason it is so long is because of all of the interviews with ordinary people who participated in the revolution and the ensuing right-wing rebellion. I wouldn't cut out a second of it, and I might just rent it again.
Customer Rating: Summary: A Dearth of Videos on this Subject Comment: Perhaps, I am overly critical, but I found this video documentary to be plodding, overlong, and too full of talking heads-- many of whom had little of importance to say or who were just long-winded or self-serving. I was most disappointed by the feeling that this video documentary was visually weak-- the viewer who wants to see what the war looked like or see scenes of ordinary life in Spain in 1936-39 will not be satisfied. In the end, these quibbles of mine may not be the fault of those who produced the video.
When the legitimate, elected Spanish government lost the civil war and was overthrown, thousands were killed, jailed or put into concentration camps, or driven into exile. Spain was subjected to decades of Francoist fascism and continuing acts of reprisal against the losing side. Presumably, the years of censorship, historical revisionism, and repression wiped out a great deal of the visual archives of the civil war in Spain. Thus, what remains today is largely the pictorial history that the "victors" preserved.
It is important to state that the Spanish Civil War brought the great "isms" of Europe and the 20th Century into collision in a country that in many ways was still in the depths of 19th Century feudalism. Working people, peasants, the disenfranchised became conscious of their class position and deprivations and took up the fight against the church, landowners, and other corrupt power holders. When the right and the military revolted against the elected Popular Front government, ordinary people rallied and fought back. But for many reasons this fight was doomed from the start. The reasons are well worth studying-- historians endlessly disagree and write from their historical and class biases regarding this war. For me, when I reflect on this conflict in which idealists fought and died in a "premature" struggle against fascism and nazism, I am always deeply touched by the courage of those who first recognized rampant evil and did something tangible to try to stop it.
Customer Rating: Summary: About the only video on this important subject. Comment: This is apparently the only comprehensive video on this important 20th century event. It is significant that it is made in Britain, since the US seems to have a nervous aversion to any occurrence that smacks of left wing politics or the aspirations of the proletariat. The Spanish Civil War is really a cautionary tale of failed American and European foreign policies and a blind fear of the red menace. This documentary is made up of several episodes, each covering different aspects of the three year struggle which started as an army rebellion versus a duly elected republic and finally became a test between the two pervasive European ideologies of the time; fascism and communism. High points are on camera interviews with eye witnesses and participants from both sides. The narrator,Frank Finlay. a British actor (The Molly Maguires) does an adequate job and is refreshingly unobtrusive. All in all this is a very good overview of an important and complicated event that was a prelude to World War 11.
